iFANN
    Buscar en iFANN...
    Iniciar sesión
    Inicio
    Noticias
    Vídeos
    Fotos
    GIFs
    Explorar
    Encuestas
    Premios
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Salas
    Notificaciones
    Mensajes
    Guardados
    Perfil
    WikiPremiosiFAMOUSClasificacionesSectoresRecompensas para creadoresRecompensas para usuariosTérminosPrivacidadNormas de la comunidadRetirada / DMCAAyudaDesarrolladores

    © 2026 iFANN

    Inicio
    Buscar
    Mensajes
    Alertas
    Perfil

    Publicación

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 Me gusta0 No me gusta0 Reposteos0 Comentarios
    ?

    Comentarios

    Aún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!

    Publicación

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 Me gusta0 No me gusta0 Reposteos0 Comentarios
    ?

    Comentarios

    Aún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!