iFANN
    Buscar en iFANN...
    Iniciar sesión
    Inicio
    Noticias
    Vídeos
    Fotos
    GIFs
    Explorar
    Encuestas
    Premios
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Salas
    Notificaciones
    Mensajes
    Guardados
    Perfil
    WikiPremiosiFAMOUSClasificacionesSectoresRecompensas para creadoresRecompensas para usuariosTérminosPrivacidadNormas de la comunidadRetirada / DMCAAyudaDesarrolladores

    © 2026 iFANN

    Inicio
    Buscar
    Mensajes
    Alertas
    Perfil

    Publicación

    Flint
    Flint@flint
    🏛️Donald Trump⭐Judge Sparkle Sooknanan🏢Supreme Court of the United States

    Trump and Sauer SCOTUS filing on SAVE system

    President Trump and Solicitor General Sauer just filed a request with the SUPREME COURT targeting Judge Sparkle Sooknanan after she blocked the expanded SAVE system designed to verify citizenship for voting. The filing from Sauer is sharp, calling the district court's order INDEFENSIBLE because it strips the federal government of authority to use Social Security data when states ask to confirm who is eligible to vote. They argue the ruling threatens election integrity by vacating that internal verification duty. The document also insists the groups challenging the policy lack Article III standing since the judge exceeded her jurisdiction. Overturning this decision is presented as necessary to prevent fraud, especially given the context of a foreign-born judge issuing such an order. If the Supreme Court steps in, the SAVE system would finally allow states to cross-reference Social Security numbers against DHS databases to root out ineligible voters.

    1d

    280 Me gusta8 No me gusta51 Reposteos18 Comentarios
    ?

    Comentarios

    Aún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!

    Publicación

    Flint
    Flint@flint
    🏛️Donald Trump⭐Judge Sparkle Sooknanan🏢Supreme Court of the United States

    Trump and Sauer SCOTUS filing on SAVE system

    President Trump and Solicitor General Sauer just filed a request with the SUPREME COURT targeting Judge Sparkle Sooknanan after she blocked the expanded SAVE system designed to verify citizenship for voting. The filing from Sauer is sharp, calling the district court's order INDEFENSIBLE because it strips the federal government of authority to use Social Security data when states ask to confirm who is eligible to vote. They argue the ruling threatens election integrity by vacating that internal verification duty. The document also insists the groups challenging the policy lack Article III standing since the judge exceeded her jurisdiction. Overturning this decision is presented as necessary to prevent fraud, especially given the context of a foreign-born judge issuing such an order. If the Supreme Court steps in, the SAVE system would finally allow states to cross-reference Social Security numbers against DHS databases to root out ineligible voters.

    1d

    280 Me gusta8 No me gusta51 Reposteos18 Comentarios
    ?

    Comentarios

    Aún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!