iFANN
    Buscar en iFANN...
    Iniciar sesión
    Inicio
    Noticias
    Vídeos
    Fotos
    GIFs
    Explorar
    Encuestas
    Premios
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Salas
    Notificaciones
    Mensajes
    Guardados
    Perfil
    WikiPremiosiFAMOUSClasificacionesSectoresRecompensas para creadoresRecompensas para usuariosTérminosPrivacidadNormas de la comunidadRetirada / DMCAAyudaDesarrolladores

    © 2026 iFANN

    Inicio
    Buscar
    Mensajes
    Alertas
    Perfil

    Publicación

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    📱Nick Fuentes🏛️Vivek Ramaswamy💭Politics

    Nick Fuentes and the Republican rout

    Was the war in Iran the thing voters couldn't get past, or does Nick Fuentes deserve more credit than anyone wants to give him? Both threads run through this Republican defeat, which gets measured against Roosevelt in 1936 and Johnson in 1964. The Iran war sits at the center of the resentment: inflation, gas prices climbing, mortgages getting harder to carry, and a whole chain of economic pain trailing behind it. Then there's Fuentes and the groypers, who can't be filed away as noise. Taking out Vivek Ramaswamy was the objective, and by the account here it landed. The day before the vote, Fuentes told his people to skip the abstention and back Democrats, all to guarantee a Republican rout. His reasoning was blunt: without such a rout, the Republican Party will never truly cleanse itself and heal. Agree or don't, the weight Fuentes and the groypers carried in this result is not something to shrug off. A force like that in the party is new, and pretending it isn't there stopped being an option. So does a defeat this size signal the neoconservative era inside the Republican Party winding down, or is it just a temporary pause?

    1w

    33 Me gusta3 No me gusta3 Reposteos11 Comentarios
    ?

    Comentarios

    Aún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!

    Publicación

    Pavellim
    Pavellim@pavellim
    📱Nick Fuentes🏛️Vivek Ramaswamy💭Politics

    Nick Fuentes and the Republican rout

    Was the war in Iran the thing voters couldn't get past, or does Nick Fuentes deserve more credit than anyone wants to give him? Both threads run through this Republican defeat, which gets measured against Roosevelt in 1936 and Johnson in 1964. The Iran war sits at the center of the resentment: inflation, gas prices climbing, mortgages getting harder to carry, and a whole chain of economic pain trailing behind it. Then there's Fuentes and the groypers, who can't be filed away as noise. Taking out Vivek Ramaswamy was the objective, and by the account here it landed. The day before the vote, Fuentes told his people to skip the abstention and back Democrats, all to guarantee a Republican rout. His reasoning was blunt: without such a rout, the Republican Party will never truly cleanse itself and heal. Agree or don't, the weight Fuentes and the groypers carried in this result is not something to shrug off. A force like that in the party is new, and pretending it isn't there stopped being an option. So does a defeat this size signal the neoconservative era inside the Republican Party winding down, or is it just a temporary pause?

    1w

    33 Me gusta3 No me gusta3 Reposteos11 Comentarios
    ?

    Comentarios

    Aún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!